Evaluate PowerMTA.
Evaluate virtual MTAs, identities, queues, provider responses, and the team that will operate the deployment.
Review the deployment choices ↗Run email delivery infrastructure on your own servers or cloud. Organise sending streams with virtual MTAs and keep queues and provider responses in view.
Follow the response from the destination provider.
The queue retains work after temporary provider deferrals.
Inspect provider response and configured retry/rate policy before changing the sending operation.
Example content and data. Explore the workflow below; nothing is sent or changed in a live account.
Evaluate virtual MTAs, identities, queues, provider responses, and the team that will operate the deployment.
Review the deployment choices ↗Evaluate the message-processing, routing-policy, and integration requirements your organisation needs to own.
Compare Momentum ↗Select a sending stream and provider response. See how a temporary deferral changes the queue and the next operational decision.
Receipts & account messages · 250 accepted · Continue monitoring queues and provider feedback. Provider acceptance does not guarantee inbox placement.
Read the operational next step ↗Continue monitoring queues and provider feedback. Provider acceptance does not guarantee inbox placement.
stream: transactional virtual MTA: transactional source IP: 192.0.2.10 provider response: 250 queued example messages: 0 queue policy: your configured settings
Illustrative mapping, not configuration directives. Confirm supported syntax and operating limits with your licensed PowerMTA version and runbook.
Review deployment considerations ↗Interactive illustration. Fictional workload and results. No live configuration changes.
Bird’s historical Emma story lists an average of 375 million messages a month before its home-grown sending system was replaced. As volume approached 400 million a month, Emma selected PowerMTA. The story does not measure post-migration throughput. The historical Emma story describes a team running its own sending infrastructure as email volume grew. That operating model includes responsibility for configuration, queues, and reputation.
Read Emma’s story ↗Historical pre-migration workload, not a measured PowerMTA result or current capacity promise.Give your sending team a clear view of identities, queues, and delivery settings. Operate the system where your business needs the control.
Place the sending layer on your own servers or cloud, with capacity and monitoring your team manages.
Use virtual MTAs to organise the IPs, queues, and configuration appropriate to each sending stream.
Inspect the queue and delivery context so your team can investigate the stream and choose the next operational step.
Use PowerMTA for the sending infrastructure you operate, and discuss how monitoring and other Bird products can fit around it.
Your infrastructure routes each configured stream.
Scope the operating and support agreement.
Hi Alex,Consider hosted sending for workloads with different ownership requirements.
Bring traffic classes, average and peak volume, regions, provider mix, and operating requirements.
Confirm the supported release, sizing, licensing, implementation, and support with the MTA team.
Agree migration stages, monitoring, incident ownership, and provider-response handling.
A practical path through setup, implementation, and the choices that matter.
Read the field guide →Deployment and product capabilities.
Hosted service or infrastructure your team runs.
Consider a programmable processing pipeline.
Bring streams, volume, regions, and support requirements.
Historical operations guidance; validate every setting against your supported release and workload.
Virtual MTAs and the responsibilities your team operates.
Follow a stream into its queue and an operational decision.
Scope licensing, the supported release, deployment, and support with the MTA team. Your team operates PowerMTA; recipient providers decide acceptance and inbox placement.
Discuss PowerMTA ↗Size the software and support around your workload.
Your team deploys and operates PowerMTA on infrastructure it controls, including monitoring, queues, and reputation. Bird helps scope licensing, supported releases, and support. Bird Email API and SMTP are hosted sending alternatives.
No. PowerMTA has a separate deployment, licensing, and support conversation. Bring your workload, regions, traffic classes, and operating responsibilities to the MTA team.
No. It is a conceptual stream and queue map. Use documentation for your supported version and scope production configuration with the MTA team. Read operating considerations.
No. The recipient provider controls acceptance and placement. Your operation should inspect temporary deferrals, bounces, queues, reputation, and its own monitoring before changing rates or retries.
Plan your rollout with our sales team, including the products and requirements your business needs. Plan your setup or talk to sales.
Yes. Evaluate moving selected traffic to hosted Bird sending while other streams remain self-operated. Scope configuration, monitoring and IP responsibility with the MTA team before changing a production route.
Virtual MTAs let your team separate traffic policies and IP use. Streams can still share sending domains and remain subject to recipient-provider policies. Review the whole sending setup when investigating reputation or delivery.
A test API key is yours immediately. Production unlocks when you add a payment method and verify a sender.
Read docs