How To Define A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) For Growth
Insights
2 Jul 2019
Guide Takeaways
An MVP is not a beta, prototype, or pitch deck — it must be usable, valuable, and minimal.
The core purpose of an MVP is to validate assumptions, test demand, and refine product-market fit.
Defining an MVP starts with tough questions: the real problem, its severity, and whether people will care enough to adopt a solution.
The “minimum” in MVP refers to the smallest set of capabilities that still delivers real, monetizable value.
Early MVP strategies include promise-testing (landing pages, mockups), manual fulfillment, and stitching together existing tools.
Market validation can happen before writing any code by testing messaging, pricing, and interest.
Manual or semi-manual processes can simulate the product experience to validate demand before building.
Using existing platforms (e.g., WordPress, scripts, no-code tools) accelerates MVP creation while reducing cost and risk.
Strong MVPs focus narrowly on the fastest path between problem and solution.
Q&A Highlights
What is a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)?
A simple, usable version of a product that delivers real value and tests whether customers care enough to use or pay for it.
Is an MVP the same as a prototype or beta?
No. A prototype tests ideas; a beta tests polish. An MVP tests market viability through real usage and value.
How do I know if a problem is worth solving?
Evaluate whether the pain point is common, frequent, and frustrating enough that people will change behavior or pay money to solve it.
What should an MVP include?
Only the smallest set of features needed to solve the core problem and demonstrate real value to early adopters.
Can I validate an MVP without building the product?
Yes — use landing pages, demos, screenshots, or ads to test whether people show interest or sign up.
What is a “concierge MVP”?
A manual, behind-the-scenes process that lets you deliver the value of the product before creating automated software.
Why use existing tools to build an MVP?
It reduces cost and time, helping you validate demand before investing in custom development.
What is the main goal of an MVP?
To validate assumptions, learn quickly, and adjust your product vision before committing to full-scale development.
The “minimum viable product” is a widely misused and misunderstood concept. But it’s powerful when done right. In this article, you will learn: The definition of a minimum viable product (MVP), What questions to ask to to create an MVP, and How to test your MVP
A minimum viable product (MVP) is an early version of a product, such as a SaaS (software as a service) application, that is designed to ensure that product vision and strategy are aligned with market needs.
Typically, an MVP delivers just enough functionality and value to appeal to early adopters and other innovators. It’s not a beta version of your product, designed for shaking out bugs or for fine-tuning features and interface elements. It’s also not an idea that exists only on paper (or slides), or a raw demonstration of a proof-of-concept.
Instead, the term “MVP” suggests something very specific:
Minimum: the smallest number of capabilities, features, and packaging that…
Viable: deliver enough value that customers are willing to spend money (or another currency such as personal information)…
Product: on something they can use today… not just invest in a future concept, promise, or offer.
The goals of an MVP are to validate the premise of a product, to test hypotheses about market needs, to make adjustments to the product vision, and to prioritize where to invest in future development. As such, MVPs are a profoundly powerful approach towards finding product-market fit.
